Back to Pricing ⭐ DEMO — Team Report
View Individual Demo Order Your Report
DEMO REPORT — This is a sample of what your team Zone Intelligence report looks like
Order Team Report — £125
TZ
TOUCHZONESYSTEM
Team Report
NORTHGATE CITY FC
4-3-3 Formation  |  National League
29 May 2026
vs Westbridge United
Northgate Stadium
Win 2–1
56%
Possession
45
Zone 1 Actions
218
Zone 2 Actions
102
Zone 3 Actions
365
Total Actions
POSSESSION ANALYSIS
Northgate City FC Westbridge United
56%
56%44%
412
Total Passes
83%
Pass Accuracy
14
Key Passes
TEAM ZONE ANALYSIS

What are team actions in zones? A team action is any moment a player receives the ball and interacts with it in that zone — a pass, a touch, a carry, a duel won. The Zone Intelligence system tracks every reception and its outcome in each of the three zones. Successful means possession was retained and play progressed (or a chance was created in Zone 3). Unsuccessful means possession was lost in that zone.

⬤ Zone 1 — Defensive Third
45
TEAM ACTIONS  |  12% of total
41
Retained & progressed
4
Possession lost
Clearances: 8  |  Recoveries: 12  |  91% retention rate
41 of 45 Zone 1 actions resulted in the ball being moved forward into Zone 2. Max 3 touches per reception applies — the team moved the ball out of the defensive third quickly, reducing risk and starting play up the pitch.
⬤ Zone 2 — Middle Third
218
TEAM ACTIONS  |  60% of total
186
Retained or progressed
32
Possession lost
Transitions to Z3: 102  |  Recoveries: 22  |  85% retention rate
Max 5 touches per reception applies. 186 of 218 Zone 2 actions were successful — the ball was received within the touch limit and either moved into Zone 3 or recycled effectively. 32 possessions were lost here.
⬤ Zone 3 — Attacking Third
102
TEAM ACTIONS  |  28% of total
18
Shot / chance created
84
No chance created
Shots: 11  |  Crosses creating chances: 7  |  18% chance creation rate
Zone 3 has no touch maximum — quality of action is the measure. 18 of 102 Zone 3 actions created a shot or chance. The other 84 were Zone 3 actions that did not directly create a chance but kept play in the attacking third.
Successful = possession retained & ball progressed zone to zone (Z1→Z2, Z2→Z3), or a shot / chance created from the action (Z3).  Unsuccessful = possession lost in that zone.
Successful vs Unsuccessful Actions per Zone
Zone Share of Total Actions
TRANSITION & PROGRESSION STATS

Transition and progression stats show how effectively the team moves the ball forward between zones. Z1→Z2 Transition measures how many Zone 1 actions resulted in the ball successfully moving into Zone 2. Z2→Z3 Progression measures how many Zone 2 actions moved the ball into Zone 3. These are direct indicators of how well the Zone Touch Model is working at team level — high transition rates mean quick ball movement within the touch limits, low rates mean possession is being lost or recycled rather than building forward.

ZONE 1 ZONE 2 Transition
91%
41 of 45 Zone 1 actions progressed to Zone 2
41 of 45 Zone 1 receptions were received and released into Zone 2 successfully. Only 4 resulted in possession loss. The Zone 1 max of 3 touches is the key — when the ball is moved quickly from the defensive third, it arrives in Zone 2 with the passing chain intact. This 91% rate is above the model's recommended ≥85% target.
Above model target (≥85%) — Z1 discipline is strong
ZONE 2 ZONE 3 Progression
47%
102 of 218 Zone 2 actions progressed to Zone 3
102 of 218 Zone 2 actions directly progressed the ball into Zone 3. The other 116 were retained in Zone 2 (84 successful but didn't reach Z3) or lost (32 turnovers). The model target for Z2→Z3 progression is ≥55% — at 47%, the team is retaining possession well in midfield but not converting that dominance into Zone 3 entries at the target rate. Faster Zone 2 release within the 5-touch max is the lever to pull.
Below model target (≥55%) — key development focus
TEAM PITCH HEAT MAP
⬤ Zone 1 Defensive Actions ⬤ Zone 2 Midfield Control ⬤ Zone 3 Attacking Threat
PASS CHAIN INTELLIGENCE
45
Zone 1
218
Zone 2
102
Zone 3
11
Shots
Chain Effectiveness
Z1 → Z2 Transition91%
Z2 → Z3 Progression47%
Forward Pass Rate64%
Turnover Recovery Rate78%
SHOOTING, THREAT & DEFENSIVE RECORD
Attacking
11
Shots For
5
On Target
2
Goals
Defensive
7
Shots Against
3
On Target
1
Conceded
Attacking Set Pieces & Crosses
14
Crosses For
4
Corners For
Defensive Set Pieces & Crosses
6
Crosses Against
3
Corners Against
INDIVIDUAL PLAYER ZONE DATA

What do these numbers mean? Each player's Z1, Z2, and Z3 figures show how many times they received the ball in each zone during the match. A high Z2 number for a midfielder means they're heavily involved in the engine room of the team. A high Z3 number for a forward means they're getting on the ball in the attacking third. Z3 Focus % shows what proportion of a player's total receptions came in Zone 3 — the higher this is, the more the player is involved in the attacking phase of play. The Grade reflects their Zone 3 involvement relative to their position.

Player Position Z1 (receptions) Z2 (receptions) Z3 (receptions) Total Z3 Focus Grade
Grade key: Strong Z3 = ≥30% of receptions in Zone 3 (high attacking involvement). Good Z3 = 18–29% (solid attacking contribution). Build Z3 = <18% (opportunity to increase Zone 3 involvement relative to position). Note: for defensive positions (GK, CB, DM) lower Z3 figures are expected and appropriate.
ZONE TOUCH MODEL — TEAM TARGETS

These are Zone Intelligence Model recommendations — not comparisons against any external database. The gold marker shows the model's recommended target for each metric. These targets reflect what the touch zone model identifies as the conditions that produce better passing chains, more shots, and stronger defensive structure. Applied from junior level to World Cup.

Possession Share ✓ Above model target
Team
56%
Recommended ≥
50%
More possession means more opportunities for the zone model to work. Sustaining ≥50% keeps the team in control of the passing chain and reduces time defending.
Team Pass Accuracy Just below target
Team
83%
Recommended ≥
85%
2% below the model's recommended minimum. The player table above shows individual zone involvement — individual touch-limit data will identify where most breakdowns are concentrated.
Zone 2 → Zone 3 Progression Needs improvement
Team
47%
Recommended ≥
55%
The model targets ≥55% of Zone 2 actions progressing into Zone 3. At 47%, the team is retaining possession well but not converting that midfield dominance into attacking entries at the required rate. Quicker Zone 2 release is the key.
Shot Output from Zone 3 ✓ Good output
Shots from Z3
11
Z3 Actions
102
2 goals from 11 shots — efficient use of Zone 3 entries. When Zone 3 receptions are handled with quick, purposeful touches, shots come from better positions. 18 of 102 Zone 3 actions created a direct shot or chance.
AREAS OF SUCCESS
Defensive Solidity

Only 7 shots conceded, 1 goal against — a strong defensive record. Zone 1 touch discipline (quick release from the defensive third) directly contributed to limiting Westbridge United's Zone 3 entries. 91% Z1→Z2 transition success shows the team moved the ball out of danger efficiently every time possession was won back in the defensive third.

Possession & Tempo Control

56% possession and 218 Zone 2 actions (60% of total) demonstrate clear control of the game's rhythm. Dominating Zone 2 is the Zone Touch Model principle at team level — the team is doing exactly that, with 85% of Zone 2 actions retained or progressed. This reduces the opposition's ability to establish their own passing chains.

Zone 3 Efficiency

2 goals from 11 shots — efficient Zone 3 output. 18 of 102 Zone 3 actions created a direct shot or chance (18% creation rate). This efficiency reflects good quality in final actions — quick touches creating shots from better positions rather than rushed, pressured situations.

Turnover Recovery

78% turnover recovery rate — the team presses and wins the ball back effectively. This is a direct outcome of strong Zone 2 positioning; when turnovers happen in the middle third, the team is compact enough to react and recover possession quickly.

AREAS OF WEAKNESS — DEVELOPMENT FOCUS
Zone 2 → Zone 3 Progression

Only 47% of Zone 2 actions progressed into Zone 3 — below the model target of ≥55%. The team is retaining possession well in the middle third but not converting that dominance into Zone 3 entries at the target rate. Faster Zone 2 release within the 5-touch max is the single biggest lever for improvement — it directly increases Zone 3 opportunity and shot creation.

Team Pass Accuracy

83% team pass accuracy — 2% below the model's recommended ≥85%. The player zone data table (above) shows each player's Zone 1, 2 and 3 involvement. Individual touch-compliance reports will identify who is holding the ball beyond the zone maximum and where breakdowns are most concentrated. Reducing individual exceedances team-wide will push this figure above the target.

Zone 3 Volume — Opportunity to Increase

28% of all team actions were in Zone 3 (102 of 365 total). The quality of Zone 3 work was good, but there is room to increase the volume of entries. This will come naturally from improving Z2→Z3 progression — when Zone 2 actions move forward more quickly, more players arrive in Zone 3 with the ball in better positions.

Individual Compliance Variation

Some players show high Zone 3 involvement but with lower Z2→Z3 progression rates — indicating Zone 3 is being reached after slower Zone 2 build-up rather than through quick Zone 2 release. Individual Zone Intelligence reports will give granular touch-compliance data for each position and identify the specific moments to work on.

ANALYST NOTES & DEVELOPMENT OBSERVATIONS

Strong Zone 2 control — the foundation of everything. Northgate City FC registered 218 actions (60% of the total) in the middle third, demonstrating the Zone Touch Model principle at team level: control Zone 2 and you control the game. The Z1→Z2 transition rate of 91% means the team is moving the ball out of the defensive third efficiently — every one of those touches in Zone 1 was received and released within the 3-touch maximum, keeping the passing chain alive and pushing play forward.

Zone 3 entry and touch discipline directly produced the goals. 102 Zone 3 actions resulted in 11 shots, 5 on target, and 2 goals. 18 of those 102 Zone 3 actions directly created a shot or chance. The connection is clear: when the ball arrives in Zone 3 through quick Zone 2 release, players receive it in better positions, with more time, and with the passing chain intact behind them. Zone 3 has no touch maximum — quality of action is the measure — and 2 goals from 11 shots reflects that quality. Shots against: 7 faced, 3 on target, 1 conceded — Zone 1 discipline was central to keeping that number low.

The Z2→Z3 progression rate is the key development focus. At 47%, the team is below the model's ≥55% target. This doesn't mean possession is being lost — 85% of Zone 2 actions were successful. But it does mean the ball is being recycled in Zone 2 rather than driven forward into Zone 3. Quicker Zone 2 release within the 5-touch max, with players making earlier movements to receive in Zone 3, is the adjustment needed. The Z1→Z2 discipline shows the team can do it — the principle is the same in Zone 2.

Development priorities:
1. Z2→Z3 progression: Target ≥55%. Faster Zone 2 release within the 5-touch max creates more Zone 3 opportunities. The DM/CM unit driving the ball forward quicker after receiving in Zone 2 is the trigger — the Zone 2 touch limit applies regardless of pressure.
2. Individual touch compliance: Review each player's Zone 2 and Zone 3 involvement data (see table). Individual Zone Intelligence reports will identify specific touch-limit exceedances that are breaking chains. Reducing these team-wide will improve pass accuracy toward the 85% model target.
3. Defensive structure: 7 shots conceded with only 1 goal is a strong ratio. The Zone 1 discipline — minimal unnecessary touches in the defensive third, quick release into Zone 2 — is contributing to this. Maintaining that discipline is as important as the attacking improvements.

TOUCHZONE
Your Touches MATTER  •  Zone 1: Max 3  •  Zone 2: Max 5  •  Zone 3: Unlimited
Demo Report — Generated 29 May 2026  •  © 2026 Touchzone. All Rights Reserved.

Ready to get your team's report?

Full team Zone Intelligence report for just £125. Every player analysed. Your Touches MATTER.

Order Team Report