Back to Pricing ⭐ DEMO — Individual Report
View Team Demo Order Your Report
DEMO REPORT — This is a sample of what your individual Zone Intelligence report looks like
Order Your Report from £55
TZ
TOUCHZONESYSTEM
Individual Report
JAMIE MACKENZIE
CENTRAL MIDFIELDER  |  NORTHGATE CITY FC
29 May 2026
vs Westbridge United
90 mins
Win
1
Zone 1 Receptions
13
Zone 2 Receptions
13
Zone 3 Receptions
27
Total Receptions
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
86%
Pass Accuracy
0
Goals
1
Assists
2
Shots on Target
ZONE RECEPTION & TOUCH COMPLIANCE

The Zone Touch Model sets a maximum touch limit per zone. Staying within that limit means the player moves the ball quickly, maintains team tempo, and keeps passing chains alive. Zone 1 max: 3 touches — move it out of the defensive third fast. Zone 2 max: 5 touches — the engine room, keep the rhythm going. Zone 3: no maximum — in the attacking third, quality of action is the measure, not touch count. Every Zone 1 and Zone 2 reception is classified as either within max or exceeded max.

⬤ Zone 1 — Defensive Third
Max: 3 touches
1
RECEPTION  |  2 total touches used
Within max (≤3 touches)
1
Exceeded max
0
1 of 1 within the 3-touch max (100%). The ball was received and released quickly in the defensive third — no unnecessary risk or delay. This is exactly what Zone 1 demands.
⬤ Zone 2 — Middle Third
Max: 5 touches
13
RECEPTIONS  |  26 total touches used
Within max (≤5 touches)
13
Exceeded max
0
13 of 13 within the 5-touch max (100%). Averaged 2.0 touches per reception — the ball was received and moved on cleanly every time through midfield. This is the kind of touch discipline that keeps passing chains alive.
⬤ Zone 3 — Attacking Third
∞ Unlimited touches
13
RECEPTIONS  |  18 total touches used
No maximum — quality of action measured
13
Zone 3 has no touch maximum — what matters is the outcome. 13 receptions, averaging 1.4 touches each. Those 13 Zone 3 actions directly contributed to 2 shots on target.
Touch Compliance — Zone 1 & Zone 2 Only
14 of 14 within max (100%)
14 within max (Z1 + Z2 combined) Zone 3 = no maximum — quality measured separately
TRANSITION & PROGRESSION STATS

Transition stats measure what happened after each zone reception — did the ball successfully move forward into the next zone? Z1→Z2 shows how many Zone 1 receptions progressed the ball into Zone 2 (rather than losing possession or being forced backwards). Z2→Z3 shows how many Zone 2 receptions progressed the ball into Zone 3. These are the building blocks of passing chains.

Z1 Z2 Transition
100%
1 of 1 Zone 1 receptions progressed to Z2
The single Zone 1 reception was received and released into Zone 2 without any delay or possession loss. 100% transition rate means no defensive third breakdowns this match.
Z2 Z3 Progression
62%
8 of 13 Zone 2 receptions progressed to Z3
8 of 13 Zone 2 receptions successfully progressed the ball into Zone 3. The remaining 5 were either retained in Zone 2 or recycled backwards — not lost. The model target for this position is ≥55%, meaning this is on target and shows effective forward intent through midfield.
What these numbers mean: A successful transition means possession was retained AND the ball moved forward into the next zone. It does not count recycled passes that stayed in the same zone, and it does not count a simple pass — it must represent genuine forward progression of play.
PITCH HEAT MAP
ZONE DISTRIBUTION
PASS CHAIN INTELLIGENCE
42
Pass Attempts
36
Completions
4
Key Passes
6
Turnovers
Touch Compliance & Pass Chain Connection

Touch compliance across Zone 1 and Zone 2 was 100% this match — 14 of 14 receptions handled within the zone maximum. The 6 turnovers all occurred in pressured situations — not from holding the ball too long beyond the touch limit. When the ball is moved within the maximum, defenders don't get time to press, passing chains stay alive, and the team keeps moving forward.

Pass Direction Breakdown
Forward Passes67% (28 of 42)
Backward / Lateral33% (14 of 42)
Where these numbers come from: Pass direction is tracked from each individual reception. Forward passes = any pass that moves the ball closer to the opponent's goal from the point of reception. Backward/lateral = any pass that goes sideways or backwards. The 6 turnovers are included in the 42 pass attempts — they represent situations where the ball was lost rather than completing a pass. The pass accuracy figure of 86% is calculated from 36 completed passes out of 42 attempts.
BACK-TO-PLAY — RECEIVING UNDER PRESSURE

Back-to-play is a fundamentally different skill to facing-play receptions. When a player receives with their back to goal, they cannot see the picture ahead — they must rely on touch feel, body orientation and quick decision-making. Touch discipline matters even more in these moments: every extra touch allows the press to arrive and closes down options. The goal is to receive, control, and either turn, lay off, or shield — all within the touch maximum for the zone. This is a separate skill category — it is tracked and reported independently from standard zone receptions.

8
Back-to-Play Receptions
Total times received with back to goal this match
6
Successful — Retained & Progressed
Ball retained and play moved forward or maintained
2
Unsuccessful — Possession Lost
Possession lost under pressure from back-to-play situation
1.8
Avg Touches — Successful Receptions
6 successful back-to-play receptions · avg 1.8 touches each
4.5
Avg Touches — Unsuccessful Receptions
2 unsuccessful back-to-play receptions · avg 4.5 touches each
Key Insight — Touch Discipline Back to Play

When possession was retained from a back-to-play reception, the average was 1.8 touches. When possession was lost, the average was 4.5 touches — more than double. This is the back-to-play model in action: the longer you hold the ball without seeing the game, the more the press arrives and the more your options close. Quick, decisive touches when back to goal directly correlate with successful outcomes. The zone touch maxes still apply when receiving back to goal — Zone 1 demands release within 3 touches, Zone 2 within 5.

ZONE RECEPTION — TOUCH COMPLIANCE (Z1 & Z2) vs QUALITY (Z3)

Zone 1 and Zone 2 show compliance with the touch maximum. Zone 3 has no maximum — all 13 receptions are shown as quality actions. Green = within max. Red = exceeded max. Cyan = Zone 3 quality action (no max).

ZONE TOUCH TARGETS — MODEL RECOMMENDATIONS

The Zone Intelligence Touch Model sets recommended targets for each metric based on the demands of the position. These are position-specific model recommendations for a Central Midfielder — internal targets set by the Zone Intelligence system. The gold marker on each bar shows the model's recommended target range.

Zone 2 Reception Share
✓ On Target
Actual
48%
Model Target
40–50%
Zone 2 is the engine room for a central midfielder. At 48%, the ball is being received in the right area of the pitch to control tempo and connect play — within the 40–50% model target.
Zone 3 Reception Share
✓ On Target
Actual
48%
Model Target
35–50%
High Zone 3 involvement shows getting into advanced positions. Zone 3 has no touch maximum — quality of action and outcome is what's measured here, not touch count.
Avg Touches per Reception (Z2)
✓ On Target
Actual
2.0
Max Touches
5
Averaging 2.0 touches per Zone 2 reception — well within the 5-touch maximum. The ball is being received and moved on efficiently through midfield. Every touch used is a touch that matters.
Avg Touches per Reception (Z3)
∞ No Maximum
Actual
1.4
Max Touches
∞ Unlimited
Zone 3 has no touch maximum — quality of action and outcome is the measure. 1.4 touches average is very efficient and directly contributed to 2 shots on target this match.
Pass Accuracy
Close to Target
Actual
86%
Model Target
≥88%
2% below the model's recommended minimum. With Zone 1 and Zone 2 compliance at 100%, the focus is on decision quality under pressure — reviewing the 6 turnovers will identify the moments to work on.
Z1+Z2 Touch Compliance Rate
✓ Excellent
Actual
100%
Model Target
≥85%
100% of Zone 1 and Zone 2 receptions handled within the touch maximum. This is the core discipline metric of the model — above the recommended 85% minimum, showing the ball is being moved quickly and efficiently across the whole pitch.
SHOOTING & ZONE 3 OUTPUT
2
Shots Total
2
On Target
13
Zone 3 Receptions
1.4
Avg Z3 Touches
Zone 3 Output: 2 shots from 13 Zone 3 receptions. The key measure in Zone 3 is not conversion rate — it is whether actions in that zone led to shots, chances, or genuine attacking threat. 2 shots on target from 13 Zone 3 receptions, with an average of 1.4 touches per reception, shows efficient and direct Zone 3 play. The ball was received and used immediately — not held, not over-dribbled.
COACHING NOTES & DEVELOPMENT OBSERVATIONS

Outstanding touch discipline in Zones 1 and 2 — 14 of 14 within the touch maximum (100%). This is the foundation of everything the Zone Touch Model measures. Zone 1 max is 3 touches, Zone 2 max is 5 touches — both were fully observed in every single reception this match. When the ball is received and released within the maximum, passing chains stay alive, the team keeps tempo, and defenders don't get the time they need to press and win the ball back.

Zone 3 is no-maximum — quality of action is the measure. Zone 3 has no touch limit because the attacking third is about creating and converting. Averaging just 1.4 touches per Zone 3 reception is very efficient and directly linked to 2 shots on target. Zone 3 involvement was high (13 of 27 total receptions), showing strong positioning in advanced areas.

Back-to-play discipline is where the next improvement is. 6 of 8 back-to-play receptions were successful (75%) — a solid return. However, the average touch count of 4.5 for the 2 unsuccessful receptions compared to 1.8 for successful ones tells a clear story: when receiving with back to goal, extra touches are the enemy. The same touch maxes apply — Zone 1 max 3, Zone 2 max 5 — and the data shows that staying inside them directly determines whether possession is kept or lost. Working on the touch model in back-to-play situations specifically — the first touch orientation, the lay-off technique, the decision to shield vs turn — will push this success rate higher.

Development priorities — focused on the Zone Touch Model:
1. Back-to-play touch discipline — target: keep all back-to-play receptions to 2–3 touches maximum regardless of zone, mirroring the touch discipline shown in regular receptions. First touch quality, body orientation on receipt, and quick decision-making are the specific skills to work on.
2. Pass accuracy under pressure — at 86% vs the model's 88% target. With Zone 1 and Zone 2 touch compliance at 100%, the turnovers are coming from pressure moments rather than touch exceedances. The focus is on the touch quality and decision speed in those specific moments — not on changing the zone model.
3. Z2→Z3 progression — 62% of Zone 2 receptions progressed into Zone 3. The model target is ≥55%, so this is already on target. Continuing to move the ball forward quickly within the Zone 2 maximum is what drives this figure up further — it's already happening.

TOUCHZONE
Your Touches MATTER  •  Zone 1: Max 3  •  Zone 2: Max 5  •  Zone 3: Unlimited
Demo Report — Generated 29 May 2026  •  © 2026 Touchzone. All Rights Reserved.

Ready to get your own report?

Individual player reports from just £55. Your Touches MATTER — see the data that proves it.

View Pricing & Order